AI QA engineer · for mobile teams
Hire Bugbee.
It shows its work.
Bugbee reproduces bug reports, verifies fixes, and hunts for defects on real mobile builds — with on-device screenshots and logs attached to every verdict. Android today, iOS in private beta.
Every verdict shipped so far:
10 bugs reproduced · 1 fix correctly cleared · 0 false passes
How a run works
The same job a QA engineer does.
Done the same way.
Bugbee doesn't scan your code and speculate. It installs your build on a device matched to the report and does the work — every phase bounded, every claim checked before it reaches you.
Reads the ticket. Picks the reported build and a matching device profile.
Drives the app on a real emulator, step by step, like a person would.
Screenshots and device logs captured at every step of the run.
A second agent tries to refute the finding. Only survivors get reported.
+ observed bug persists
No new tool to learn
You already know how to use it.
Bugbee works where your bugs already live. Mention it on the ticket; it answers on the ticket.
Evidence
Every verdict it has shipped.
Eleven tickets tested end-to-end on real product repos. Not a benchmark — the actual ledger, including the one where the right answer was “no.”
| Ticket | Reported bug | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| #8777 | Marketplace stuck on Empty List View after dismissing an error | ● REPRODUCED |
| #14135 | Tablet — Settings and dashboard Add buttons misaligned | ● REPRODUCED |
| #11627 | Account creation loses entered data on Terms & Privacy tap | ● REPRODUCED |
| #14047 | Analytics event not logged on app startup | ● REPRODUCED |
| #14144 | Tablet — reported crash when editing Shortcuts | ○ NOT REPRODUCED |
| The verdict that matters most — Bugbee ran the full flow and reported the crash didn't happen, instead of forcing the answer the ticket expected. A QA tool you can trust has to be able to say no. | ||
| + 6 more | Localization, stale headers, overlapping layers, wrong support links… | ● REPRODUCED |
Why you can trust it
Built to be doubted.
Every design decision assumes you won't take Bugbee's word for it — because you shouldn't have to.
Every verdict is a behavior observed on a device.
Screenshots and device logs from the run are attached to every claim. Nothing is inferred from reading code.
When it can't prove something, it says so.
Flows that need real hardware or a paired device get bounced with a precise reason — never an invented pass.
Judged against your team's QA rules.
Bugbee triages and judges using your written acceptance criteria and conventions, not a model's taste.
A second agent tries to kill every finding.
Candidate findings are only reported after a dedicated reviewer fails to refute them on the evidence.
Explore mode
It also finds bugs nobody filed.
Point Bugbee at a feature area and it explores like a QA engineer on a mission: exercising flows, checking must-pass behavior, and hunting adjacent defects. On its first live run it confirmed three bugs in a feature with no open tickets at all.
Boundaries
What Bugbee won't do.
A QA tool is only as good as the claims it refuses to make.
Guess. If a scenario can't be proven on the device it has — real hardware, paired accessories, camera flows — it declines with the exact reason, and tells you what it would need.
Overclaim platforms. Android is supported today. iOS runs in private beta on Simulator — join the waitlist and tell us you're iOS-first.
Bury you in noise. Findings that don't survive adversarial review never reach your ticket. One confirmed bug beats twenty maybes.
FAQ
Fair questions.
What does Bugbee need from us?
Read access to your issue tracker, a way to fetch your builds (CI artifact or direct upload), and a test account for your app. Onboarding is guided — most teams are running their first retest the same day.
Does it replace our test suite?
No — it feeds it. Every bug Bugbee reproduces becomes a durable, human-readable regression flow you keep, and your growing suite runs against every release candidate.
How is this different from AI test-generation tools?
Bugbee doesn't generate tests from your code and hope they're meaningful. It does QA work: reproduce the report, capture the evidence, survive adversarial review, deliver a verdict. The output is a decision you can act on, with proof attached.
What can't it test?
Anything that needs physical hardware: Bluetooth pairing with real devices, camera capture, push-dependent flows on real devices. These get bounced with a precise reason instead of a made-up result. Real-device support is on the roadmap.
Where do runs happen?
In isolated CI environments — one per team. Your builds, credentials, and evidence never share infrastructure with another customer.
Early access
Put Bugbee on your team.
We onboard a few teams at a time, hands-on, so every run is worth trusting. Tell us where your bugs live and we'll be in touch.
@bugbee retest latest